Post Content
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
Quick Summary
-
Being financially ready for retirement does not always translate into feeling ready. Even among households with no debt, $1 million saved, and steady guaranteed income, anxiety about retiring is common.
-
If you want to separate emotional discomfort from actual financial risk, you can get matched with a financial advisor and model whether retiring now versus working longer changes your long-term outcomes with SmartAsset, for free.
-
And if fear of portfolio drawdowns is the sticking point, some retirees add income streams that are not tied to daily market moves, including options like Arrived that allow investors to get started with fractional real estate for as little as $100.
A 61-year-old with no debt, a paid-off home, about $1 million saved, and about $8,000 a month in combined pensions and Social Security would, by most traditional benchmarks, appear well positioned for retirement.
The only unknown was health insurance, estimated at roughly $1,000 a month until Medicare eligibility. On paper, the plan worked.
Yet the individual described anxiety about stepping away from work. Watching account balances stop growing, or begin to decline, felt uncomfortable. Retiring before 65 felt undeserved, even “lazy.” Decades of saving had conditioned the household to equate progress with accumulation, and the idea of drawing down assets triggered guilt rather than relief.
The question was not whether retirement was affordable. It was whether the fear itself meant retirement was a mistake. That reaction is far from unusual.
Research on retirement transitions consistently shows that financial anxiety does not disappear simply because someone reaches traditional benchmarks. A growing body of behavioral finance research finds that stress often persists even among financially secure households, driven by uncertainty, loss of routine, and the fear of making an irreversible decision.
Surveys also point to what economists often call the “retirement spending puzzle.” Many retirees underspend relative to what their financial plans support, even after controlling for health and longevity risk. The reluctance to spend is frequently psychological rather than mathematical, rooted in decades of reinforcement that saving is virtuous and spending represents failure.
In that context, fear at retirement age does not automatically signal financial risk. It often reflects a transition problem that numbers alone do not resolve.
In this situation, a great portion of monthly expenses was already covered by guaranteed income. Pensions and Social Security provided a baseline that did not depend on market performance. The investment portfolio functioned primarily as a buffer and supplement, not the sole source of cash flow.
That difference matters. Households that rely heavily on portfolio withdrawals are more exposed to market timing and sequence risk. Households whose fixed expenses are largely covered by guaranteed income tend to be more resilient, even when portfolio values fluctuate.
A financial advisor can compare retiring now versus working longer, stress-testing how sensitive income and sustainability are to market downturns. If you want to determine whether fear reflects real exposure or simply discomfort with change, you can use SmartAsset to get matched with a fiduciary financial advisor, for free.
Another major source of anxiety is ambiguity. Many households know their income sources exist, but have never seen them clearly mapped against actual spending.
Guaranteed income, portfolio withdrawals, and discretionary expenses blur together, making it difficult to understand what truly depends on market performance.
Consolidating accounts and cash flow can make that distinction more concrete. Seeing how much of monthly spending is already covered before touching investments often reframes perceived risk. Platforms that bring IRAs, rollovers, and ongoing cash flow into one view help retirees see what income is fixed versus variable, which is why some use tools like SoFi to get that clarity in one place, with no minimum balance required.
Even after the math works, some retirees remain uncomfortable with the idea of selling assets to fund living expenses. That reaction is behavioral, not irrational.
One way some households reduce that psychological friction is by adding income sources that are less tied to day-to-day market movements, lowering the sense that every expense directly reduces principal.
That is where income-oriented diversification sometimes enters the conversation. Options like Arrived offer access to fractional real estate investments designed to generate income, allowing investors to reframe part of their plan around cash flow rather than drawdown, starting with as little as $100.
Fear alone is not a signal to keep working, just as confidence alone is not a reason to stop. What matters is whether the plan is resilient and whether anxiety reflects genuine exposure or a natural response to a major life change.
The right next step is not adherence to a rigid rule. It is clarity. Separate emotional discomfort from financial risk, model the outcomes, and make the decision based on resilience rather than habit, starting with a financial stress test.
Image: Imagn
This article I'm 61 With No Debt, Financially Secure, $1 Million Saved and Still Afraid to Retire originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Terms and Privacy Policy