Post Content
For years, Tricolor Holdings marketed itself as a solution for car buyers shut out of traditional auto loans. The company specialized in selling used vehicles to borrowers with poor or limited credit, primarily across the South and Southwest, offering financing where banks often wouldn’t.
Behind that rapid growth, prosecutors now allege (1), was a sweeping fraud that deceived banks and investors, and helped the company raise billions before collapsing into bankruptcy.
-
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don’t have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here’s how
-
Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
-
I’m almost 50 years old and have nothing saved for retirement. What do I do? Don’t panic. Here are 6 easy ways to catch up (and fast)
Federal prosecutors say the scheme began around 2018 and continued until Tricolor filed for bankruptcy in September 2025. An indictment in Manhattan charged founder and CEO Daniel Chu and chief operating officer David Goodgame with orchestrating what prosecutors called a years long, “systematic fraud.”
“Fraud became an integral component of Tricolor’s business strategy,” U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton said. “The resulting billion-dollar collapse harmed banks, investors, employees and customers. It also undermines confidence in our financial system.”
The government says Tricolor executives repeatedly misrepresented the quality and value of the company’s auto loans, which were used as collateral to secure funding. One tactic allegedly involved “double-pledging” the same loans to multiple lenders at the same time, effectively using identical collateral to back different borrowing arrangements.
Prosecutors also allege that loan data was manipulated so that delinquent or charged-off loans appeared eligible for financing. By making risky loans look healthier than they were, Tricolor was able to convince banks and investors that its loan portfolio was stronger and more diversified than reality.
Those misrepresentations, prosecutors say, allowed Tricolor to obtain billions of dollars from lenders and investors. At the time of its bankruptcy filing, the company claimed it had more than $1 billion in assets.
The fallout didn’t stop with Tricolor. Banks including JPMorgan and Jefferies Financial Group had extended hundreds of millions of dollars in financing to Tricolor and to auto parts maker First Brands, which failed in the same month. The twin bankruptcies rattled Wall Street and briefly sent shares of several regional banks sharply lower amid fears that other risky loans might be lurking on balance sheets.
Read More: Young millionaires are rethinking stocks in 2026 and banking on these assets instead — here’s why older Americans should take note
Subprime auto lending provides vehicle financing to borrowers with low credit scores (typically 580 to 619) or limited credit histories. These loans carry higher interest rates and fees than prime loans to offset perceived lending risk.
Such loans play a significant role in the U.S. credit system. For borrowers with low credit scores or thin credit histories, these loans can be one of the few ways to buy a car (2), often a necessity for commuting to work or caring for family.
But the same features that make subprime lending accessible also make it risky. Interest rates are higher, loan terms can be complex and defaults are more common. Lenders often bundle loans together and sell them to banks or investors, who rely heavily on data provided by the originating company to assess risk.
That reliance creates vulnerabilities. If loan data is poorly monitored or intentionally manipulated, problems can snowball quickly. Aggressive growth incentives can encourage companies to prioritize loan volume over quality, while weak oversight allows bad practices to persist.
Subprime auto lending has faced rising default rates in recent years, as higher interest rates and inflation squeeze lower-income borrowers, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (3). While most lenders aren’t accused of fraud, the sector’s structure makes it particularly sensitive to lax controls and aggressive assumptions.
In Tricolor’s case, prosecutors argue those vulnerabilities were exploited on a massive scale. By masking delinquent loans and double-pledging collateral, executives allegedly shifted risk onto banks and investors who believed they were funding far safer assets.
Industry observers say the case is a warning sign rather than a total outlier.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon underscored that concern after Tricolor’s collapse, warning reporters on a roundtable call, reported by CNBC (4), that the bankruptcies were signs that corporate lending standards had grown too loose. “When you see one cockroach, there are probably more,” he said.
For consumers, the Tricolor case is a reminder that subprime auto loans can carry risks far beyond a monthly payment. High interest rates mean balances decline slowly, leaving borrowers vulnerable if income drops or expenses rise. In some cases, loans can exceed the value of the vehicle itself, trapping borrowers in negative equity.
Shoppers can reduce risk by slowing down and scrutinizing financing offers. Comparing loan terms across lenders, checking the annual percentage rate, and understanding how long it will take to build equity can help prevent costly surprises. Credit unions and community banks may offer more transparent alternatives, even for borrowers with imperfect credit.
-
This $1B private real estate fund is now accessible to non-millionaires. Here’s how you can get started with as little as $10
-
Rising costs are eating into retirement savings, and 92% of surveyed retirees agree — here are 4 strategic ways to protect your money in 2026
-
Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich — and ‘anyone’ can do it
-
Robert Kiyosaki says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year — and he begs investors not to miss its ‘explosion’
Article sources
We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.
U.S. Department of Justice (1); Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (2); Federal Reserve Bank of New York (3); CNBC (4)
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Terms and Privacy Policy